SCIENCE-ISLAM

Posted by keith2009 at 03:51

Posted by keith2009 at 23:45

Darwinists have recently been chasing around after fossils discovered decades ago. They keep looking for fossils that “they can suggest as transitional forms.” First, they trumpeted the fossil Ida, discovered in 1983, as the eighth wonder of the world. When this resulted in a fiasco they quickly retracted all their claims about Ida. The new star of the show is ARDI. ARDI (Ardipithecus ramidus), discovered in 1994, was recently heralded as a glorious discovery 15 years later. Darwinists again claimed that they had discovered that long sought after and fictitious missing link. The Darwinist press went straight to work. Within a few days there was almost nowhere that the name ARDI could not be seen. The same deceptive techniques for the last 150 years were used. Darwinist propaganda functioned totally as planned and everything was conducted according to the rules of the Darwinist dictatorship. It was first claimed that the life form was a perfect missing ink. They said “It walked upright, despite being 4.4 million years old.” Robot drawings were produced, and these were then animated in a computer environment. The image of an ape walking upright with sure steps appeared in all Darwinist publications. The visual part of the propaganda was complete. All that remained was demagoguery. And since Darwinists were well acquainted with demagoguery, that was soon resolved. The techniques of Darwinist propaganda had been applied with no interruptions. The only thing that Darwinists had failed to include in their calculations was that this ruse would inevitably be exposed. The field was not empty as it had been before. They never imagined that the ARDI deception would inevitably emerge into the light of day. DR. OKTAR BABUNA EXPLAINS THE ARDI FOSSIL DECEPTION LIVE ON AL JAZEERA TV (October 3, 2009) As with All Their Transitional Fossil Tales, Darwinists Are Deceiving People with Regard to ARDI: As we have already made clear many times before, Darwinists use the following technique when it comes to the fictitious evolution of man: they take an extinct gorilla or chimpanzee. That is easy for Darwinists because only 120 OUT OF THE 6000 APE SPECIES THAT ONCE EXISTED ARE STILL ALIVE TODAY. In other words, the fossil remains from 5880 ape species are perfect tools for Darwinist speculation. Darwinists generally invent highly primitive scenarios using these fossils, making claims such as “all right, it is a monkey, but its thumb is bent and the soles of its feet are curved, meaning it is turning into a human being.” The scenario is totally illogical, but these illogical accounts may appear quite convincing to people with no knowledge of the subject when published in world famous Darwinist publications, when adorned with scientific terminology nobody can comprehend, and when those who espouse them are professors blindly devoted to Darwinism, in other words, when a lie is repeated over and over again. Darwinists thus take advantage of people’s lack of knowledge, the influence of the media and propaganda techniques, and have been engaged in this base strategy for many years now. In the case of ARDI, Darwinists produced an identical copy of the BONOBO rather than an extinct species. And they said, “all right, it is an ape, but it stands upright!” Darwinists are deceiving people with this claim. They have found the firing range empty and are free to fire at will. ARDI The Idea that ARDI Walked Upright Is a Terrible Deception: Found in 1994, the fossil skeleton was broken up when first discovered. So much so that when paleontologists first picked up the fossilized bone fragments they were highly brittle. Paleontologists investigating the fossil said, from pictures taken when it was first discovered, that the pelvis in particular looked like a stew and that the bones would need “reconstruction” millimeter by millimeter. In line with that decision, Darwinists took millimetric fragments of uncertain shape and constructed the kind of pelvis they wanted out of them. A living thing’s posture is a complex issue that can be determined through the structure of the pelvis and the ratios between various other structures in the body. In order for an upright posture to be established, the pelvic bone has to be examined with millimetric and certain measurements, and the angles between the pelvic bone, the femur and the knee bones have to be determined using an exact and very fine calculation. It is impossible for the delicate calculations in question to be made in this fossil, more than half of which was missing and whose pelvis had been totally reconstructed. It is very easy, however, for the fossil to be set out in such a way as to show its owner walking upright. Any paleontologist can arrange the fragments in question and then interpret the resulting new fossil as he or she wishes. This was noted in an article about ARDI in Time magazine: “Indeed, looking at the evidence, different paleoanthropologists may have different interpretations of how Ardi moved...” [1] In addition, ARDI’s well preserved foot structure totally repudiates Darwinists on the subject. The inward-pointing big toe on ARDI’s feet and the lack of arched feet that human beings have are some of the clearest proofs that this life form did not walk upright. The BBC web site said in a report on ARDI that on the basis of the evidence in question “she could not walk or run for long distances.” [2] A report on the National Geographic web site said that “Ardi would have walked on her palms as she moved about in the trees.” [3] Darwinists selected a fossil to speculate on 15 years after its discovery. The fossil subjected to that speculation must be one that fully supports the scenario of upright gait on which Darwinists have pinned their hopes. And since there is no available transitional fossil, the ideal subject for speculation, for Darwinists, is a FRAGMENTED fossil. That is what ARDI made possible for Darwinists: They took the fragmented fossil, arranged it as they chose and engaged in such speculation as they wished. And that is how Darwinist deception works. Why 15 Years Later? Because Darwinists realized they had been routed. The last few years in particular have been a time when Darwinists have suffered a great and very powerful collapse. The techniques of Darwinist deception have been exposed, the absence of any transitional fossils has been made clear, and Darwinist frauds have been unmasked. But most important of all, 250 MILLION FOSSILS THAT ALL PROVE CREATION HAVE EMERGED. The Atlas of Creation has dealt Darwinists the heaviest blow of all. Today there is no-one, Darwinist included, who is unaware THAT NOT A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL EXISTS. Darwinists are therefore in a state of stunned shock. As a result of that great shock, they are frantically looking for a way out, pulling fossils of PERFECT LIFE FORMS DATING BACK 15-20 years from their drawers and writing tall tales about them. This Darwinist wriggling is the clearest sign of the rout they have suffered. The nonsense produced on the basis of an ordinary fossil ape or lemur also documents that fact. But the fact is that the theory of evolution requires the existence not of 1, 3 or a dozen TRANSITIONAL FOSSILS, BUT OF BILLIONS. BUT THERE EXISTS NOT ONE TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL, let alone billions. The reason for this nonsense being peddled by Darwinists is their defeat and state of despair. [1] Michael D. Lemonick and Andrea Dorfman, "Excavating Ardi: A New Piece for the Puzzle of Human Evolution," Time magazine (October 1, 2009). [2] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8285180.stm [3] Jamie Shreeve, “Oldest Skeleton of Human Ancestor Found,” National Geographic magazine (October 1, 2009). Oct 07, 2009

Posted by keith2009 at 22:55

A fossil discovered in China the other day was quickly taken up as a “four-winged bird” in the Darwinist media. Darwinists right away claimed that this fossil might be “the ancestor of birds.” As ever, they immediately gave the animal a name. They baptized it Anchiornis huxleyi, in memory of Thomas Huxley, an atheist, Darwinist and 32nd degree freemason known as Darwin’s bulldog. The fossil belonged to a bird, with wings and also feathers on its hind legs. The fossil, which Darwinists were unable to account for, also conflicted with the claims of the theory of evolution. As we know, despite being a perfect bird Archaeopteryx is regarded as a transitional form by Darwinists making childish claims. (You can read about the scientific evidence showing that Archaeopteryx is a perfect bird here and here.) This new fossil, found in strata dating back 151-161 million years, was older than Archaeopteryx. But from the Darwinist perspective it exhibited no imaginary transitional form characteristics that it needed to go to Archaeopteryx. With its “four wings,” as Darwinists described it, this life form represent a huge puzzle in terms of Darwinist theory. As they strive to account for the supposed evolution of two wings, Darwinists now have to account for third and fourth wings not observed in dinosaurs, nor flying squirrels nor birds. This of course deals a profound and severe blow to the Darwinist claim of evolution from bipedal dinosaurs. For that reason Darwinists began talking about a transitional form “whose rear wing-like structures gradually became vestigial.” Not even able to account for the two wings possessed by birds, they now began defending the idea “two pairs of wings that formed in some way and then became vestigial for some reason.”But that account is nothing less than an expression of despair. Anchiornis Huxleyi Is Not a Transitional Fossil But a Species of Bird Like Those Living Today Despite all the Darwinist speculation, it appears from even a brief examination of the Anchiornis Huxleyi fossil that it represents a species of bird similar to those living today. The fossil in question exhibits fully avian features in terms of skull and general anatomy. In terms of its wings and feathers, it appears to resemble the today’s species of birds with muffed feet. In addition to wings, these animals have feathers strongly reminiscent of wings on their back legs. The feathers in question do not function as wings, but are important in giving the animal an impressive appearance. This approximately 160-million-year-old life form possesses the same features as present-day birds with muffed feet. It represents an extinct member of the species that comprise this family. This is so obvious that any scientist looking at pictures of it will easily see this clear resemblance. As we have already seen, in order to be able to suggest that this fossil resembles a transitional form, Darwinists maintain that the rear feathers that pose such a dilemma for their theory gradually became “vestigial.” What this means, according to the theory of evolution is: “A dinosaur gradually decided to fly, following which it developed a pair of wings. It then thought another pair of wings would come in handy and grew those, too. But as it grew this second pair it then thought they were actually unnecessary. It finally decided these wings should become vestigial and disappear and continued its imaginary evolutionary process with just one pair of wings.” That, in summary, is the fairy tale that Darwinists are telling, dressed up in scientific terminology, in world-renowned journals. The points in this extraordinarily illogical scenario, which not even a child would be taken in by, that represent insoluble dilemmas for Darwinists are as follows: - There is no such thing as a transition from dinosaurs to birds. Such a passage is physiologically impossible and, naturally, THERE EXISTS NOT A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL that might confirm this impossible scenario. - Birds did not emerge from some other life form gliding through the air. Birds have always existed as birds, and appeared suddenly with their magnificent appearances. As with all other life forms, THERE EXISTS NOT A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL to show that birds evolved. - Bird feathers and wings are some of the most complex structure investigated by biology today. It is totally ridiculous to claim that an unconscious life form decided these would be necessary, grew them and later gave up and allowed them to become vestigial. The proponents of Darwinism ARE IN AN IMPOSSIBLE POSITION IN THE FACE OF A SINGLE BIRD FEATHER. - Four wings represent a considerable advantage for a living thing. Four-winged life forms can maneuver relatively much better than two-winged ones. For example, thanks to their four wings dragonflies and honeybees are able to maneuver very much easier. Four wings should therefore be an advantage for a life form. As we have seen, this illogical claim is even incompatible with evolution’s own claims. - The animal HAS NOT A SINGLE STRUCTURE DEVELOPING FROM A MORE PRIMITIVE FORM that would allow it to be regarded as a transitional form. All of its structures are fully functional and sublimely complex. - All the fossils put forward by Darwinists in order to supposedly confirm their scenarios of a passage from land to air, and that they still frequently attempt to bring up today, BELONG TO FULLY FORMED AND PREFECT LIFE FORMS. Since Archaeopteryx and Microraptor gui, another bird species with muffed feet, are nothing more than perfect bird species that existed millions of years ago, they cause grave concern to Darwinists, who have sought a way of escape from all the evidence of Creation by depicting them as transitional forms. Darwinists are following the same course with the newly discovered fossil. In the same way that every fossil discovered BELONGS TO A PERFECT LIFE FORM, so Anchiornis Huxleyi IS A PERFECT BIRD SPECIES that represents the highly decorative species of birds with muffed feet alive today and that has in all probability become extinct. And as a representative of birds with muffed feet that dates back 160 million years it constitutes significant evidence for Creation. A second important point here is that none of its organs exhibit any transitional form features. Darwinists are engaging in the same offensive techniques with this new fossil that once again reveal their own helplessness. THEY ARE TRYING TO GATHER SUPPORT USING FALSE TECHNIQUES, by writing articles, holding conferences and disseminating the false idea this is a transitional form from the mouths of the most renowned Darwinist professors in the world’s best known journals. They have been doing the same thing for the last 150 years. They always try to deceive people with the same soiled propaganda and to impose the worst deception of the century on them using the same cunning stratagems. But the media are no longer suited to such things. Darwinism HAS BEEN ENTIRELY ELIMINATED BY THE EXISTENCE OF 250 MILLION FOSSILS THAT ALL PROVE CREATION. IT HAS BEEN SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN that the handful of fossils Darwinists claimed were SUPPOSEDLY TRANSITIONAL FORMS HAVE ALL BEEN INVALIDATED. The Atlas of Creation HAS DECLARED TO THE WORLD THE FACT THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS EVOLUTION, a fact which Darwinists have tried to cover up for the last 150 years. That is why nobody any longer listens or gives credence to these methods of deception that have persisted for the last 150 years. And Darwinists are well aware of this. And that is the reason for their feelings of despair, misery and defeat. for more visit www.harunyahya.com

Posted by keith2009 at 19:00

Adnan Oktar: They approached with humor and tried to tell something. They ask if Adnan Oktar would get angry with it. He wrote something similar to it. When was it found, in 1996 or 1990? Adnan Oktar: Where was it found? False Ardi Drawing. Ardi… It is 1,22 cm [4 feet] and 50 kg [110 pound] and was found in Ethiopia in 1994. See, what I tell is the truth. Yes, it was found in Africa…They say those apes willing to see the distance inbetween the herbs stood up. But be rational! There are lots of other animals that stand erect, at times all these animals stand erect, so do bears, for example. I have never seen a bear standing on its feet all the time. They generally stand erect to observe the environment but when necessary they go into herbs and walk on their four feet. They have employed a very bad, fabricated evidence. Now I submit an evidence to Kanal D (Channel D): the Bonobo ape, it lives in our day. And it smiles to Kanal D. It smiles, laughs at them. It smiles to all the employees of Kanal D and even to Aydın Dogan and says, “Here I am, I do exist.” As you see, its teeth are the same, it is similar to human teeth. The teeth of human beings are exactly like this. That is how Allah created them. This is very normal and it has never gone through a change. The animal has remained the same for hundreds of thousands of years, millions of years insha’Allah. Its skeleton structure is also the same; the fossil they uncovered is the same with Bonobo, the same with the Ardi. It is on the camera right now. And this is the skull of the uncovered animal. It is exactly the same with Bonobo. Moreover it is highly similar to orangutan. It is similar to orangutan. For instance it is also similar to orangutan in terms of this tooth structure. That means that there are such kinds of ape and orangutan species. These can also be found at times. They put forward the fossil discovered in 1994 as if it were a newly-found one. This is a shame, and very childish. This is not reasonable! They retrieve a piece discovered in 94 from the archive and put it in front of us. The animal remains the same. It has not gone through any change. Its skeleton is also the same, it is the same in all aspects. For instance the length of its hands, the length of its fingers, its tooth structure. The Bonobo ape is the same, it is the same with Ardi. It has no difference. Its foot structure, its hand structure, they can take and look at them. Yes, there is no need to get excited after remaining silent for some time. Every each time I will give the necessary answer. They cannot shoot in the dark. We can only talk if they will speak in the light of scientific evidence. Also it is a perfect animal. It is flawless, has no pathology. It has exact symmetry. It has no flaw in its bone structure and skeleton structure. All its organs are perfect. It is not a transitional form. So does Ardi. For that reason Kanal D feasts for no reason. Meanwhile we do not feel sorry or get angry. It is only a matter of giving an answer. These answers will crush them into pieces. The living bonobos display exactly the same characteristics with the recently found fossil "Ardi". Oktar Babuna: In the past they used to do whatever they wanted in the absence of someone preventing them… Adnan Oktar: Yes, immediately. Whenever they put forward a false fossil, we give an immediate answer. In the past they could convince whomever they wished. Darwinist friends could also tell lies. But now this is no longer the case.

Posted by keith2009 at 18:16

As for those who believe and do right actions and humble themselves before their Lord, they are the Companions of the Heaven, remaining in it timelessly, for ever. (Surah Hud, 23) Sincerity means being deeply devoted to Allah by heart. A sincere person has a deep fear for Allah, profoundly believes in Him, sees and advocates the righteousness in the best way. A sincere person is the one who believes in Allah with certainty, the Hereafter, prophets, the Heaven and the Hell and angels. WHAT IS ESSENTIAL IS NOT ONE’S SEEING HIMSELF SINCERE BUT THE RECOGNITION OF HIS SINCERITY BY ALLAH. The Prophet Muhammad (may Allah bless him and grant him peace), the Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him), the Prophet Moses (pbuh), the Prophet Abraham (pbuh), the Prophet Solomon (pbuh), the Prophet Joseph (pbuh), the Prophet Jonah (pbuh), the Prophet Job (pbuh) and all the other prophets are the sincere servants of Allah. We are aware of prophets’ sincerity because Allah sees them sincere and declares them to be so. All of the prophets were blessed people who were devoted to our All-Mighty Lord with great love and experienced sincerity in its most profound state. Likewise, due to their sincerity, all the prophets were blessed people who absolutely engaged in the most accurate act, whose deeds resulted in good and beauty and who truly turned to Allah in all their deeds. Due to his fear for Allah and profound love of Allah, a sincere person is someone who readily discriminates between the right and the wrong, who absolutely implements what is right according to the Qur’an and, without seeing any limits in closeness to Allah and love for him, who discharges all the requirements of the religion in the most accurate and absolute manner. Consequently, sincerity is the kind of attitude which appears with fear of Allah, and closeness and love of Him and is experienced in the form as depicted in the Qur’an. If a Christian is devoid of any Islamic knowledge, we may hope for his enterance to the Heaven, as long as he advocates Allah’s existence and unity, believes in the Heaven and the Hell, has faith in the destiny and the Hereafter, performs his regular prayers (salat), fasts albeit in his own way, and pays the alms. Similarly, if a Jew has no knowledge about Islam, then we can hope that he can go to the Heaven as long as he observes what is lawful and unlawful, has faith in the destiny and Hereafter, performs his regular prayers (salat) and fasts. All of these are the commandments stated in the Torah and the Gospel. If he is sincere and has no knowledge about Islam, by Allah’s leave, we may hope that a Christian or a Jew can also enter the Heaven as long as he wholeheartedly fulfills all these religious obligations. Since sincerity can only be experienced with unconditional belief in Allah, hoping for the Heaven merely saying, “I am sincere”, without fulfilling the decrees of the religion is an insincere view that only deceives the person himself. It is a great collapse of reason to appear with a reasoning commanding that “satanists can go to the Heaven if they are sincere” and try to show a criminal person who overtly murders a human being and who evidently denies Allah as a sincere person deserving the Heaven. A person who denies Allah, commits crimes and engages in immoral acts commits all these misdeeds due to his insincerity and his disbelieving and rebellious mind. Such a person is not even remotely close to sincerity. He is dishonest and a liar. What is essential is not one’s seeing himself sincere but the recognition of his sincerity by Allah. As long as a satanist does not regret, repent and turn to Allah with sincerity, he is an unbeliever who is doomed to the Hell. (Allah knows the truth) Almighty Allah gives as an example in the Qur’an of a man who owns a garden and who considers himself sincere and thinks that he deserves the Heaven even though he is in complete denial of the Hereafter: He entered his garden and wronged himself by saying, “I do not think that this will ever end.” “I do not think the Hour will ever come. But if I should be sent back to my Lord, I will definitely get something better in return.” (Surat al-Kahf, 35-36) Our Lord informs us of the condition of the person whose garden was destroyed as a calamity that came over him due to his denial. There was no group to come to his aid, besides Allah, and he was not given any help. In that situation the only protection is from Allah, the Real. He gives the best reward and the best outcome. (Surat al-Kahf, 43-44) Almighty Allah “knows what their hearts keep hidden and what they divulge” (Surat an-Naml, 74). Those who are insincere to Allah are people who cannot appreciate Allah properly and who cannot comprehend this great fact. Almighty Allah, Who knows all what is concealed, is certainly the One, Who knows best the sincerity in a person’s heart. Our Lord states in one verse of the Qur’an as thus: Your Lord knows best what is in your selves. If you are righteous, He is Ever-Forgiving to the remorseful. (Surat al-Isra, 25) for more visit www.harunyahya.com

Posted by keith2009 at 00:39